icon 0
icon TOP UP
rightIcon
icon Reading History
rightIcon
icon Log out
rightIcon
icon Get the APP
rightIcon

The Thirteenth, Greatest of Centuries

Chapter 4 THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AND DISCIPLINE.

Word Count: 7689    |    Released on: 01/12/2017

claim the attention of modern students, will probably be somewhat mitigated by the thought that after all there were only few in attendance at the universities, and as a consequen

of this medieval time with which we are concerned. We may say at once that it is a matter of comparatively easy collation of statistics to show, that in proportion to the population of the various countries, there were actually more students ta

ge. It is usually considered, however, that these figures are gross exaggerations. It is easy to assert this but rather difficult to prove. As a matter of fact the nearer one comes to the actual times in the {59} history of education, the more definitely do writers speak of these large numbers of students in attendance. For instance Gascoigne, who says that there were thirty thousand students at the University of Oxford at the end of the Thirteenth Ce

nce of very large numbers is much more doubtful. Making every allowance, however, there can be no hesitation in saying that Oxford had during the last quarter of the Thirteenth Century a larger number than ever afterwards within her walls and that Cambridge, though never so numerous as her rival, had a like good fortune. Professor Laurie of Edinburgh, a very conservative authority and one not likely to concede too much to the Middle Ages in anything, would allow, as we shall see, some ten thousand students to Oxford. Others have claimed more than half that number for Cambridge as the lowest possible estimate. Even if it be conceded, as has sometimes been urged, that all those in service in the universities were also counted as students, these numbers would

matter. The authorities are neither difficult of consultation nor distant, and comparatively much more is known about the population of England at this time than about most of the continental countries. England was under a single ruler, while

e just what was the population even of England in the Thirteenth Century. During Elizabeth's reign there were, according to the census, an estimate made about the time of the great Armada, altogether some four millions of people. Froude, accepts this estimate as representing very well the actual number of the population. Certainly there were not more {61} than five millions at the end of the Sixteenth Century. Lingard, who for this purpose must be considered as a thoroughly conservative authority, estimates that

from this standpoint. In the attendance to the number of population the comparison is even more startling for those who have not thought at all of the Middle Ages as a time of wonderful educational facilities and opportunities. In the greater City of New York as we begin the Twentieth Century there are perhaps fifteen thousand students in attendance at educational institutions which have university privileges. I may say that this is a very liberal allowance. At universities in the ordinary sense of the word there are not more than ten thousand students and the remainder is

the higher education provided by our universities and colleges. At the end of the Thirteenth Century in England there were at least ten thousand students out of a population of not more and very probably less than three m

y desire for higher education and even fewer opportunities. It was thought that there was constant repression of the desire for knowledge which springs so eternally in the human heart and that the Church, or at least the ecclesiastical authorities of the time, set themselves firmly against widespread education, because it would set people to thinking for themselves. As a matter of fact, howev

Education in the University of Edinburgh, and the other Thomas Davidson, a well-known American authority on educational {63} subjects. Each of their works from which I shall quote has been published or revised within the last few year

inly evidence that the Oxford attendance was never so great as has been alleged (see Anstey's 'Mon Acad.'); but when we consider that attendants, servitors, college cooks, etc., were regarded as members of the university community, and that the universities provided for a time the sole recognized tr

niversities rather than younger than they are at the present time. The rough hazing methods employed, almost equal to those of our own day! would seem to indicate this. Besides, as Professor Laurie confesses in the next paragraph, many of the students were actually much older than at present. Our university courses are arranged for young men between 17 and 22, but that is, to fall back on Herbert Spencer, presumably because the period of infancy is {64} lengthening with the evolution of the race. There are many who consider that at the present time students are too long delayed in the opportunit

hirteenth Century, and admits that the numbers, while perhaps not so large as have been reported, were very large in comparison to modern institutions of the same kind, and frankly co

s Davidson, author of Aristotle and Ancient E

mber with what poor accommodations-a bare room and an armful of straw-the students of those days were content, and what numbers of them even a single teacher like Abelard could, long before draw into lonely retreats. That in the Twelfth and following centuries there was no lack of enthusiasm for study, notwithstanding the troubled condition of th

pp

OUT MONEY CHA

ANNUNCIATI

IAGE AT CA

(MOSAIC, ST.

ome minds as to make them give up the thought of large numbers at the medieval universities. Professor Laurie has answered it very effectively, however, and in his plausible explanation gives a number of points which emphasize the intense ardor of these students of the Middle Ages in their search for knowledge, and shows how ready th

wments of Cathedral schools also were frequently used to enable promising scholars to attend foreign universities. Monasteries also regularly sent boys of thirteen and fourteen to university seats. A papal instruction of 1335 required every Benedictine and Augustinian community to send boys to the universities in the proportion of one in twenty of their residents. Then, state authorities ordered free passages for all who were wen

his Soirées de St. Petersburg, that history for the three hundred years before his time "had been a conspiracy against the truth." Curiously enough the editors of the Cambridge Modern History in their first volume on the Renaissance, re-echoed this sentiment of the French historical writer and philosopher. They even use the very words "history has been a conspiracy against the truth" and proclaim that if we are to get at truth in this ge

ent, but far from it. There are times when one cannot help but feel that it is not ignorance, but a deliberate purpose to minimize the importance of these times in culture and education, that is at the basis of some of the utterly mistaken remarks that are made. We shall take occasion only to give one example of this, but that will afford ampl

ed, has been the whole spirit and content and the real progressiveness of education in this wonderful period. After some belittling expressions as to the influence of Christianity on education-expressi

rbally. The barons took pride in their ignorance. Even after the efforts of the Twelfth Century, instruction remained a luxury for the common people; it was the privilege of

Schools throughout the country, is a most wonderful concoction of ingredients, all of which are meant to dissolve every possible idea that people might have of the existence of any tincture of education during the Middle Ages. There is only one fact which deeply concerns us because it refers to the Thirteenth Century. M. Compayr

6

ossibly it seemed to the translator to make the story more complete to leave out this one poor monk and perhaps one monk more or less, especially a medieval monk, may not count for very much to modern students of education. There are those of us

uld admit more than ten thousand), at the University of Oxford, though all Christian Europe at this time did not have a population of more than 15,000,000 people. He must have known, too, or be hopelessly ignorant in educational matters, that many of the students at these universities belonged to the Franciscans and Dominicans, and that indeed many of the greatest teachers at the universities were members

nastery began to degenerate. It was almost directly in the path of armies which so frequently went down to Italy because of the German interest in the Italian peninsula and the claims of the German emperor. After a time according to tradition, the emperor insisted that certain of the veterans of his army should be received and cared for in their old age at St. Gall. Gradually this feature of the institution became more and more prominent until in the Thirteenth Century it had become little more than a home for old soldiers. In order to live on the benefices of the monastery these men had to submit to ecclesiastical regulations and wear the habit. They were, it is true, a sort of monk, that is, they were willing, for the sake of the peace and ease which it b

e first makes it clear how much opposed the Christian Church was to education, then he admits that she did some things which cannot be denied, but minimizes their significance. Then he concludes that it was not {70} the fault of the Church, but in this there is a precious bit of damni

nners. Doubtless, also, during the feudal period the priest often became a soldier, and remained ignorant. It would, however, be unjust to bring a constructive charge against the Church of the Middle Age, and to represent it as systematically hostile to instruction. Directly to the contrary, it is the clergy who, in the midst of the general barbarism, preserved some vestiges of the ancient culture. The only schools of that period are the Episcopal and claustral schools, the first annexed to the Bishops' palaces, the second to the monasteries. The religious orders voluntarily associated manual labor with mental labor. As far back as 530, St. Benedict founded the Convent of Monte Cassino, and drew up statutes which m

tra

zo Go

OMNIUM

NA

PICTOR

HEOLOGU

TIS E

7

ver, that they had taken major orders or had in any way bound themselves irrevocably to continue in the clerical vocation. The most surprising thing about the spread of culture and the desire for the higher education during the Thirteenth Century, is that they developed in spite of the fact that the rulers of the time were all during the century, embroiled in war either with their neighbors or with the nob

tudents at the universities were by ecclesiastical courtesy then, clerics (from which comes the word clerk, one who can read and write) though not in orders, and it was because of this that the university was able to maintain the rights of students. It was well understood that after graduation men might take up the secular life and indeed most of them did. In succeeding chapters we shall see examples of this and discuss the question further. Professors at the {72} universities had to maintain their clerical

heir pleasures and their martial duties to have time for the higher education. The tradition that a nobleman should be an educated gentleman had not yet come in. Indeed many of the nobility during the Thirteenth Century rather prided themselves on the fact that they not only had no higher education, but that they did n

ing one's way through the university was more common in the Thirteenth Century than it is at the present day, though we are proud of the large numbers who now succeed in the double task of supporting and educating themselves, with

friend sending him up a student to Oxford and asking that his bills be sent to him. St. Edmund's answer was that he would not be robbed of an opportunity of doing good like this, and he took upon himself the burden of caring for the student. At the time there

it must have been practically impossible for the faculties of universities to keep order among such vast numbers. As a matter of fact, however, the story of the origin and maintenance of discipline in these universities is one of the most interesting features of university life. The process of discipline became in itself a very precious part of education, as it should be of course in any well regulated institution of learning. The very fact, moreover, that in spite of these large numbers

enthusiasm for learning that in these difficult times gathered so many students together from distant parts of the world, when traveling was so difficult and dangerous, and kept them at the universities for long years in spite of the hardships and inconveniences of the life. With regard to our modern universities the same thing is true, and the outside world knows much more of the escapades of the few, the little scandals of college life, that scarcely make a ripple but are so easily exaggerated, and so frequently repeated and lose nothing by repetition, the waste of time in athletics, in gambling, in social things, t

the faculty, and thus anticipating what is most modern in the development of the disciplinary regime of our up-to-date universities. At first apparently, in the schools from which the universities originated there was no thought of the necessity for discipline. The desire for education was considered to be sufficient to keep men occupied in {75} such a way that further discipline would not be necess

beginning since they occupied themselves entirely with their teaching and preparation for lectures. What was to become later one of the principal instruments of discipline was at first scarcely more than a social organization among the students. Those who came from different countries were naturally attracted to one another, and were mo

s a formal organization took up their cause and maintained their rights, even to the extent of an appeal to formal process of law before the magistrates, if necessary. The nations were organized before the faculties in the universities were formally recognized as independent divisions of the institution, and they acted as intermediaries between the university head and the students, making themselves responsible for discipli

his Rise and Early Constitution of Universities in th

ieval Education, by S. S. Laurie, LL.D., Professor of the Institutes and History o

re elected, not by the students as in Bologna and Padua, but by the students and masters. Each nation with its procurator and deans was an independent body, passing its own statutes and rules, and exercising supervision over the lodging-houses of the students. They had each a seal as distinguished from the university seal, and each procurator stood to his "nation" in the same relation as the Rector did to the whole university. The Rector, again,

degree, responsible for the advances in the direction of liberty which are chronicled during this great century. This was a form of unconscious education but none the less significant for that, and eminently practical in its results. At this time in Europe there was no place where the members of the community who flocked in largest numbers to the universities, the sons of the middle classes, could have any opportunities to share in government or learn the precious lessons of such participation, except at the universities. There gradually came an effort on the part o

7

Claim Your Bonus at the APP

Open
1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION2 Chapter 2 UNIVERSITIES AND PREPARATORY SCHOOLS.3 Chapter 3 WHAT AND HOW THEY STUDIED AT THE UNIVERSITIES.4 Chapter 4 THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS AND DISCIPLINE.5 Chapter 5 POST-GRADUATE WORK AT THE UNIVERSITIES.6 Chapter 6 THE BOOK OF THE ARTS AND POPULAR EDUCATION.7 Chapter 7 ARTS AND CRAFTS-GREAT TECHNICAL SCHOOLS8 Chapter 8 No.89 Chapter 9 LIBRARIES AND BOOKMEN.10 Chapter 10 THE CID, THE HOLY GRAIL, THE NIBELUNGEN.11 Chapter 11 MEISTERSINGERS, MINNESINGERS, TROUVèRES, TROUBADOURS.12 Chapter 12 GREAT LATIN HYMNS AND CHURCH MUSIC.13 Chapter 13 THREE MOST READ BOOKS OF THE CENTURY.14 Chapter 14 SOME THIRTEENTH CENTURY PROSE.15 Chapter 15 ORIGIN OF THE DRAMA.16 Chapter 16 FRANCIS THE SAINT-THE FATHER OF THE RENAISSANCE.17 Chapter 17 AQUINAS THE SCHOLAR.18 Chapter 18 ST. LOUIS THE MONARCH.19 Chapter 19 DANTE THE POET.20 Chapter 20 THE WOMEN OF THE CENTURY.21 Chapter 21 CITY HOSPITALS-ORGANIZED CHARITY.22 Chapter 22 GREAT ORIGINS IN LAW.23 Chapter 23 JUSTICE AND LEGAL DEVELOPMENT.24 Chapter 24 DEMOCRACY, CHRISTIAN SOCIALISM AND NATIONALITY.25 Chapter 25 GREAT EXPLORERS AND THE FOUNDATION OF GEOGRAPHY.26 Chapter 26 AMERICA IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY.27 Chapter 27 A REPRESENTATIVE UPPER HOUSE.28 Chapter 28 THE PARISH, AND TRAINING IN CITIZENSHIP.29 Chapter 29 THE CHANCE TO RISE.30 Chapter 30 INSURANCE.31 Chapter 31 OLD AGE PENSIONS.32 Chapter 32 THE WAYS AND MEANS OF CHARITY-ORGANIZED CHARITY.33 Chapter 33 SCIENTIFIC UNIVERSITIES.34 Chapter 34 MEDICAL TEACHING AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS.35 Chapter 35 MAGNETISM.36 Chapter 36 BIOLOGICAL THEORIES, EVOLUTION, RECAPITULATION.37 Chapter 37 THE POPE OF THE CENTURY.38 Chapter 38 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION.39 Chapter 39 BIBLE REVISION.40 Chapter 40 FICTION OF THE CENTURY.41 Chapter 41 GREAT ORATORS.42 Chapter 42 GREAT BEGINNINGS IN ENGLISH LITERATURE.43 Chapter 43 GREAT ORIGINS IN MUSIC.44 Chapter 44 A CHAPTER ON MANNERS.45 Chapter 45 TEXTILE WORK OF THE CENTURY.46 Chapter 46 GLASS-MAKING.47 Chapter 47 INVENTIONS.48 Chapter 48 INDUSTRY AND TRADE.49 Chapter 49 FAIRS AND MARKETS.50 Chapter 50 INTENSIVE FARMING.51 Chapter 51 CARTOGRAPHY AND THE TEACHING OF GEOGRAPHY.52 Chapter 52 No.5253 Chapter 53 No.5354 Chapter 54 No.5455 Chapter 55 No.55