/0/1697/coverbig.jpg?v=20171121151307&imageMogr2/format/webp)
The French revolutionary period contains so much of greater importance that historians have neglected the Nootka Sound incident. Of the few writers who have discussed it, the majority have written from a partisan standpoint, or, if impartial themselves, have drawn their information from partisan pamphlets. The consequence is that many errors regarding it have crept into the work of the best writers. The purpose of this monograph is to give a more extended account, drawn largely from unpublished sources, and to correct as many of the errors as possible.
The Nootka Sound Controversy Preface
The French revolutionary period contains so much of greater importance that historians have neglected the Nootka Sound incident. Of the few writers who have discussed it, the majority have written from a partisan standpoint, or, if impartial themselves, have drawn their information from partisan pamphlets. The consequence is that many errors regarding it have crept into the work of the best writers. The purpose of this monograph is to give a more extended account, drawn largely from unpublished sources, and to correct as many of the errors as possible.
Besides working over the documents that have been published and the accounts that have been written, a thorough search has been made in the archives of the Indies at Seville, in the national historical archives at Madrid, and in the British Museum and the public record office at London. A less thorough search has been made in the archives of foreign affairs at Paris and the archives of the Department of State at Washington. More than 500 pages of unpublished documents relating to the dispute have been transcribed and used. The classified bibliography at the close will make clear the sources of information and their relative value.
0
My acknowledgments are due to the following persons for valuable assistance: To my wife, who worked with me continually for two and a half months in the Spanish archives and the British Museum, and who has criticised my manuscript and read the proof sheets; to Prof. J. F. Jameson, whose untiring interest has been a constant source of inspiration, and to whose aid and painstaking suggestions are largely due any merits that the monograph may possess; to Prof. A. C. McLaughlin, for research in the archives at Washington; to Prof. F. J. Turner, for manuscripts and other material from his own collection. Besides these, I wish to make special mention of the kindness and assistance of Se?or Pedro Torres-Lanzas, director of the archives of the Indies at Seville, and of Se?or Vicente Vignau y Ballester, director of the national historical archives at Madrid.
Chicago, July, 1904.
/1/105404/coverorgin.jpg?v=d939c1a8d0134274943ca633deea3ff2&imageMogr2/format/webp)
/0/78663/coverorgin.jpg?v=b705411c5144e51405caa1dd738aa5d2&imageMogr2/format/webp)
/0/73838/coverorgin.jpg?v=13386996a09e7a2f9334fc224055a59a&imageMogr2/format/webp)
/1/101074/coverorgin.jpg?v=52a77558f0c5d2cc3a3fa45a8ec0a7db&imageMogr2/format/webp)
/1/105950/coverorgin.jpg?v=7fbc16f30b677c11017bd323fba77a57&imageMogr2/format/webp)
/1/102860/coverorgin.jpg?v=fd4279179a94dd229627ce7640bf190d&imageMogr2/format/webp)
The Nootka Sound Controversy
William Ray Manning
Literature
Preface
19/11/2017
Chapter I. INTRODUCTION
19/11/2017
Chapter II
19/11/2017
Chapter III
19/11/2017
Chapter IV
19/11/2017
Chapter V
19/11/2017
Chapter VI
19/11/2017
Chapter VII
19/11/2017
Chapter VIII
19/11/2017
Chapter IX
19/11/2017
Chapter X
19/11/2017
Chapter XI
19/11/2017
Chapter XII
19/11/2017
Chapter XIII
19/11/2017
Chapter XIV
19/11/2017